Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 123 JAMES M KIERNAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

238

53%

LEVEL 2

172

38%

LEVEL 3

31

7%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

201

54%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

18

5%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

109

48%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

93

50%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

129

59%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

108

59%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

52

51%

LEVEL 2

41

40%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

42

57%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

181

55%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

20

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

151

54%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

12

4%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

153

44%

LEVEL 2

157

45%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

125

46%

LEVEL 2

125

46%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

85

85%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

76

77%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

37
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

169

46%

LEVEL 2

160

44%

LEVEL 3

31

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

138

46%

LEVEL 2

140

47%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

69

85%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

63

90%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

38

59%

LEVEL 2

23

36%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

163

53%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.