Skip to Content
Main content

PS 28 WRIGHT BROTHERS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

153

42%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

145

42%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

75

44%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

78

46%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

19

48%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

126

44%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

114

36%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

98

36%

LEVEL 2

118

43%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

39

81%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

47

71%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

115

49%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

92

72%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

83

78%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

125

44%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.