Skip to Content
Main content

MS 243 CENTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

85

39%

LEVEL 4

89

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

85

40%

LEVEL 4

103

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

46

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

61

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

44

39%

LEVEL 4

43

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

51

47%

LEVEL 4

42

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

61

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

75

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

17

59%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

13

52%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

83

40%

LEVEL 4

89

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

103

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

83

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

97

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

6

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.