Skip to Content
Main content

PS 76 A PHILLIP RANDOLPH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

99

40%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

104

43%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

39

34%

LEVEL 2

50

43%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

53

43%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

60

45%

LEVEL 2

56

42%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

55

45%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

84

41%

LEVEL 2

87

42%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

68

35%

LEVEL 2

89

46%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

101

47%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

73

34%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

99

45%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

79

35%

LEVEL 2

98

44%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

21

75%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

93

41%

LEVEL 2

99

44%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.