Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL OF THE FUTURE HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

114

41%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

107

39%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

61

43%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

21

45%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

19

50%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

39

38%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

39

38%

LEVEL 3

40

38%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

40

51%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

97

39%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

100

41%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

19

54%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

60

39%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

69

41%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

57

46%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

46

43%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.