PS 42 BENJAMIN ALTMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

121

35%

LEVEL 3

119

34%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

112

30%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

159
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

167
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

27

51%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

177
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.