JOHN F KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

57

9%

LEVEL 2

215

34%

LEVEL 3

230

36%

LEVEL 4

132

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

127

33%

LEVEL 4

95

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

182
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

70

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

18

34%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

23

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

294
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

185

37%

LEVEL 4

109

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

25

35%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

25

4%

LEVEL 2

190

33%

LEVEL 3

224

39%

LEVEL 4

132

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

95

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

32

51%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

344
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

179

31%

LEVEL 3

217

38%

LEVEL 4

127

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

89

28%

LEVEL 3

117

37%

LEVEL 4

82

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

36

56%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.