ANN MACARTHUR PRIMARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

30

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

44

46%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

33

36%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

62

49%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

76

44%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

50

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

72

48%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

20

51%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.