Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN PHILIP SOUSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

115

40%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

51

40%

LEVEL 4

35

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

46

41%

LEVEL 4

25

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

64

41%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

96

44%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

15

58%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

107

45%

LEVEL 4

60

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

178
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

114

42%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.