Skip to Content
Main content

SEWANHAKA HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

148

29%

LEVEL 2

211

42%

LEVEL 3

118

23%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

145

31%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

84

32%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

18

19%

LEVEL 2

35

37%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

38

39%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

75

44%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

58

38%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

63

45%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

53

40%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

198

44%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

141

35%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

41

76%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

49

75%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

129

29%

LEVEL 2

155

35%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

16

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

119

43%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

85

30%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.