BELLMORE-MERRICK CENTRAL HS DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

733
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,462

LEVEL 1

221

15%

LEVEL 2

508

35%

LEVEL 3

482

33%

LEVEL 4

251

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

113

18%

LEVEL 2

190

30%

LEVEL 3

224

36%

LEVEL 4

97

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

423
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 738

LEVEL 1

70

9%

LEVEL 2

245

33%

LEVEL 3

266

36%

LEVEL 4

157

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

310
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

151

21%

LEVEL 2

263

36%

LEVEL 3

216

30%

LEVEL 4

94

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

78

24%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

23

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

17

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

621
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,241

LEVEL 1

186

15%

LEVEL 2

434

35%

LEVEL 3

414

33%

LEVEL 4

207

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

248
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

76

16%

LEVEL 2

153

32%

LEVEL 3

180

38%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

719
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,281

LEVEL 1

119

9%

LEVEL 2

443

35%

LEVEL 3

471

37%

LEVEL 4

248

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

74

13%

LEVEL 2

172

31%

LEVEL 3

216

39%

LEVEL 4

95

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

102

56%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

39

58%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

708
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,362

LEVEL 1

192

14%

LEVEL 2

462

34%

LEVEL 3

464

34%

LEVEL 4

244

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

97

17%

LEVEL 2

163

29%

LEVEL 3

209

37%

LEVEL 4

92

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

46

46%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.