FLORAL PARK-BELLEROSE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

131

15%

LEVEL 2

313

36%

LEVEL 3

268

31%

LEVEL 4

147

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 668

LEVEL 1

98

15%

LEVEL 2

258

39%

LEVEL 3

220

33%

LEVEL 4

92

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

130

33%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

206
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

91

20%

LEVEL 2

166

36%

LEVEL 3

138

30%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

301
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

72

12%

LEVEL 2

213

36%

LEVEL 3

192

33%

LEVEL 4

109

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

155

37%

LEVEL 3

151

36%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

44

38%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

21

25%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

406
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

75

10%

LEVEL 2

286

37%

LEVEL 3

262

34%

LEVEL 4

144

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

61

10%

LEVEL 2

235

39%

LEVEL 3

214

36%

LEVEL 4

92

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

56

61%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

37

56%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

389
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

98

13%

LEVEL 2

270

36%

LEVEL 3

247

33%

LEVEL 4

142

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

210

38%

LEVEL 3

199

36%

LEVEL 4

83

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

33

32%

LEVEL 2

43

42%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

32

29%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.