GOTHAM AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

157

46%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

95

27%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

79

43%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

78

51%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

17

49%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

94

45%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

30

32%

LEVEL 2

43

46%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

38

36%

LEVEL 2

48

45%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

149

49%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

141

44%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

28

76%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

141

42%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

13

87%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

47

48%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

110

46%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

82

32%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.