Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH BELLMORE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 979

LEVEL 1

213

22%

LEVEL 2

418

43%

LEVEL 3

260

27%

LEVEL 4

88

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

82

18%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

155

34%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

79

16%

LEVEL 2

214

43%

LEVEL 3

145

29%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

134

28%

LEVEL 2

204

42%

LEVEL 3

115

24%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

36

44%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

29

41%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

151

20%

LEVEL 2

322

43%

LEVEL 3

195

26%

LEVEL 4

73

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

114

37%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

15

58%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

51

47%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

24

43%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 833

LEVEL 1

119

14%

LEVEL 2

379

45%

LEVEL 3

250

30%

LEVEL 4

85

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

155

38%

LEVEL 3

149

37%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

94

64%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

32

55%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

205
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

172

38%

LEVEL 3

155

34%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

312
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 837

LEVEL 1

167

20%

LEVEL 2

358

43%

LEVEL 3

233

28%

LEVEL 4

79

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

46

32%

LEVEL 2

60

42%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.