Skip to Content
Main content

BOWLING GREEN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

33

39%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

40

42%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

36

36%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

123

42%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

98

40%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

52

79%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

113

36%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

26

45%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.