Skip to Content
Main content

BARKER ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

494
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

39

5%

LEVEL 2

201

27%

LEVEL 3

240

33%

LEVEL 4

254

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

111

21%

LEVEL 3

185

35%

LEVEL 4

191

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

266
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

152

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

213
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

107

41%

LEVEL 4

106

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

228
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

102

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

85

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

27

32%

LEVEL 4

48

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

30

37%

LEVEL 4

45

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

372
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

162

29%

LEVEL 3

193

34%

LEVEL 4

179

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

267
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

129

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

10

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

488
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

13

2%

LEVEL 2

173

26%

LEVEL 3

236

35%

LEVEL 4

252

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

369
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

96

20%

LEVEL 3

180

37%

LEVEL 4

189

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

26

43%

LEVEL 2

28

47%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

483
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

33

5%

LEVEL 2

185

26%

LEVEL 3

235

34%

LEVEL 4

248

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

369
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

109

22%

LEVEL 3

181

36%

LEVEL 4

188

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.