Skip to Content
Main content

FRED W HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

150

29%

LEVEL 2

213

41%

LEVEL 3

114

22%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

119

45%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

127

29%

LEVEL 2

192

43%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

80

31%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

98

21%

LEVEL 2

206

45%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

42

84%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

105

33%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

131

43%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

73

48%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.