Skip to Content
Main content

LETCHWORTH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

109

28%

LEVEL 2

148

38%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

159

42%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

98

50%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

103

28%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

148

42%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

146

42%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

119

36%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

38

90%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

40

89%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

55

37%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

74

53%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.