Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 895

LEVEL 1

230

26%

LEVEL 2

326

36%

LEVEL 3

257

29%

LEVEL 4

82

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

190

28%

LEVEL 2

235

35%

LEVEL 3

175

26%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

194
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

82

19%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

148

33%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

123

27%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

323
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 832

LEVEL 1

211

25%

LEVEL 2

298

36%

LEVEL 3

247

30%

LEVEL 4

76

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

239
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

181

29%

LEVEL 2

214

34%

LEVEL 3

168

26%

LEVEL 4

71

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

128

17%

LEVEL 2

302

40%

LEVEL 3

249

33%

LEVEL 4

80

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

120

20%

LEVEL 2

220

37%

LEVEL 3

171

29%

LEVEL 4

76

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

102

75%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

70

79%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

190

35%

LEVEL 3

186

34%

LEVEL 4

72

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

135

38%

LEVEL 2

136

39%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

106

45%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.