Skip to Content
Main content

ONEIDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 866

LEVEL 1

307

35%

LEVEL 2

341

39%

LEVEL 3

163

19%

LEVEL 4

55

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

132

42%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

130

31%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

93

22%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

177

40%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

80

49%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

291

37%

LEVEL 2

307

39%

LEVEL 3

144

18%

LEVEL 4

49

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

114

43%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

8

73%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

183

25%

LEVEL 2

330

45%

LEVEL 3

162

22%

LEVEL 4

54

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

124

91%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

51

93%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

183

42%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

203

47%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

98

55%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.