Skip to Content
Main content

WAYLAND-COHOCTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

173

28%

LEVEL 2

257

42%

LEVEL 3

145

24%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

171

31%

LEVEL 2

222

40%

LEVEL 3

130

23%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

103

32%

LEVEL 2

137

43%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

128

44%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

167

28%

LEVEL 2

250

42%

LEVEL 3

141

24%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

169

31%

LEVEL 2

212

39%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

123

22%

LEVEL 2

254

45%

LEVEL 3

142

25%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

126

25%

LEVEL 2

208

42%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

50

89%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

45

75%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

158

43%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

131

39%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.