Skip to Content
Main content

WAYLAND-COHOCTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

116

28%

LEVEL 2

176

43%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

105

30%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

86

44%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

85

46%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

113

29%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

133

40%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

174

47%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

130

42%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

33

89%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

63

44%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.