Skip to Content
Main content

LOWVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

116

38%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

58

44%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

75

45%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

109

38%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

111

43%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

106

45%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

37

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

23

70%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

75

53%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

47

37%

LEVEL 2

60

47%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.