Skip to Content
Main content

CASE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

226

42%

LEVEL 2

181

34%

LEVEL 3

109

20%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

192

43%

LEVEL 2

154

35%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

135

48%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

165

42%

LEVEL 2

123

31%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

135

42%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

24

49%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

26

47%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

17

41%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

140

32%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

117

33%

LEVEL 2

142

40%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

86

91%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

75

86%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

159

50%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

157

54%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.