Skip to Content
Main content

MOUNT MARKHAM CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

181

37%

LEVEL 2

204

42%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

80

44%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

25

30%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

55

57%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

179

38%

LEVEL 2

196

41%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

187

48%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

51

36%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

78

80%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

29

76%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

124

48%

LEVEL 2

111

43%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

49

60%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.