Skip to Content
Main content

GREGORY B JARVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

253

39%

LEVEL 2

232

36%

LEVEL 3

106

16%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

144

36%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

71

18%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

114

36%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

128

40%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

85

45%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

237

39%

LEVEL 2

221

36%

LEVEL 3

100

16%

LEVEL 4

49

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

137

37%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

161

30%

LEVEL 2

224

41%

LEVEL 3

104

19%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

95

28%

LEVEL 2

143

42%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

92

90%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

49

88%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

191

52%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

98

42%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.