Skip to Content
Main content

COXSACKIE-ATHENS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

123

33%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

120

36%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

74

41%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

74

44%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

103

31%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

96

33%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

36

95%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

96

43%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

74

48%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

73

53%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.