ARCADIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

264

33%

LEVEL 2

324

41%

LEVEL 3

139

18%

LEVEL 4

65

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

192

38%

LEVEL 2

167

33%

LEVEL 3

103

21%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

171

45%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

168

41%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

126

47%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

168

29%

LEVEL 2

246

43%

LEVEL 3

108

19%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

40

40%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

39

51%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

47

50%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

26

41%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

173

25%

LEVEL 2

306

45%

LEVEL 3

135

20%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

120

29%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

91

81%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

72

89%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

89

23%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

175

44%

LEVEL 2

155

39%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

134

48%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.