Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 774

LEVEL 1

254

33%

LEVEL 2

267

34%

LEVEL 3

190

25%

LEVEL 4

63

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

213

35%

LEVEL 2

223

36%

LEVEL 3

116

19%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

114

30%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

140

36%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

124

39%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

240
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 731

LEVEL 1

238

33%

LEVEL 2

253

35%

LEVEL 3

180

25%

LEVEL 4

60

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

206

35%

LEVEL 2

209

36%

LEVEL 3

111

19%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 700

LEVEL 1

194

28%

LEVEL 2

255

36%

LEVEL 3

188

27%

LEVEL 4

63

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

158

29%

LEVEL 2

214

39%

LEVEL 3

115

21%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

60

81%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

55

85%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

148

47%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

131

49%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.