Skip to Content
Main content

JOHNSTOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

246

34%

LEVEL 2

316

43%

LEVEL 3

118

16%

LEVEL 4

50

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

207

38%

LEVEL 2

200

37%

LEVEL 3

96

18%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

93

27%

LEVEL 2

166

47%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

153

40%

LEVEL 2

150

39%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

132

46%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

228

34%

LEVEL 2

294

43%

LEVEL 3

109

16%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

191

38%

LEVEL 2

182

37%

LEVEL 3

87

17%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

12

57%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

170

27%

LEVEL 2

303

47%

LEVEL 3

117

18%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

133

29%

LEVEL 2

193

42%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

76

84%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

74

88%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

162

41%

LEVEL 2

181

46%

LEVEL 3

39

10%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

139

46%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.