Skip to Content
Main content

GLOVERSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

296

47%

LEVEL 2

242

38%

LEVEL 3

79

12%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

228

59%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

139

44%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

104

56%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

157

49%

LEVEL 2

128

40%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

124

62%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

260

46%

LEVEL 2

210

37%

LEVEL 3

76

13%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

196

58%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

24

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

184

36%

LEVEL 2

227

45%

LEVEL 3

78

15%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

135

48%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

112

88%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

93

89%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

83

49%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

36

47%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

248

53%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

192

62%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.