Skip to Content
Main content

SALMON RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

350

52%

LEVEL 2

227

34%

LEVEL 3

76

11%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

267

52%

LEVEL 2

167

33%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

143

43%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

207

61%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

163

59%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

240

54%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

50

11%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

40
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

171

53%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

109

48%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

94

51%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

261

45%

LEVEL 2

219

38%

LEVEL 3

73

13%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

195

45%

LEVEL 2

161

37%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

89

88%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

72

91%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

54

40%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

310

57%

LEVEL 2

173

32%

LEVEL 3

48

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

247

58%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

98
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

344

52%

LEVEL 2

225

34%

LEVEL 3

76

11%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

78
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

254

51%

LEVEL 2

166

33%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

13

93%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.