TONAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

190

29%

LEVEL 2

281

42%

LEVEL 3

139

21%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

146

33%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

138

41%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

115

35%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

83

37%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

164

27%

LEVEL 2

257

42%

LEVEL 3

134

22%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

130

22%

LEVEL 2

267

45%

LEVEL 3

139

24%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

60

81%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

55

89%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

115

34%

LEVEL 2

151

45%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

93

39%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.