Skip to Content
Main content

KAEGEBEIN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

22

21%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

46

33%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

38

36%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

78

44%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

28

33%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

22

32%

LEVEL 2

33

48%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.