Skip to Content
Main content

EDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

156

25%

LEVEL 2

243

39%

LEVEL 3

174

28%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

125

31%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

41

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

98

32%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

148

24%

LEVEL 2

239

39%

LEVEL 3

168

27%

LEVEL 4

56

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

100

26%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

217

40%

LEVEL 3

171

32%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

62

68%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

47

76%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

188

37%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

55

43%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

53

50%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.