Skip to Content
Main content

CHEEKTOWAGA-SLOAN UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

230

38%

LEVEL 2

244

40%

LEVEL 3

101

17%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

186

42%

LEVEL 2

154

35%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

137

43%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

111

47%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

195

36%

LEVEL 2

222

41%

LEVEL 3

96

18%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

150

39%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

19

61%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

220

45%

LEVEL 3

100

20%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

116

33%

LEVEL 2

138

39%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

92

79%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

70

81%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

162

45%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

122

47%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.