Skip to Content
Main content

DR LYDIA T WRIGHT SCH OF EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

266

61%

LEVEL 2

138

32%

LEVEL 3

26

6%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

308

75%

LEVEL 2

85

21%

LEVEL 3

16

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

123

54%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

146

69%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

143

69%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

162

82%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

249

62%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

25

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

281

75%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

13

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

14

78%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

192

55%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

219

69%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

16

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

74

89%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

89

97%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

42

60%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

55

71%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

224

61%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

253

76%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.