Skip to Content
Main content

DISCOVERY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

126

35%

LEVEL 2

136

38%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

85

30%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

50

38%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

37

61%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

28

51%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

14

54%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

89

29%

LEVEL 2

123

40%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

56

23%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

37

69%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

59

38%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

77

48%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

53

41%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.