CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

368
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

92

13%

LEVEL 2

247

35%

LEVEL 3

224

32%

LEVEL 4

144

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

52

12%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

136

32%

LEVEL 4

101

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

194
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

80

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

34

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

33

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

284
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

71

13%

LEVEL 2

202

36%

LEVEL 3

185

33%

LEVEL 4

99

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

222

36%

LEVEL 3

220

35%

LEVEL 4

143

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

135

34%

LEVEL 4

101

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

53

64%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

343
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

63

10%

LEVEL 2

195

32%

LEVEL 3

208

35%

LEVEL 4

135

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

99

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

29

27%

LEVEL 2

52

49%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

14

35%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.