Skip to Content
Main content

KINRY ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

86

25%

LEVEL 2

138

40%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

36

72%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

27

38%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

32

46%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.