Skip to Content
Main content

PINE PLAINS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

146

31%

LEVEL 2

179

38%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

86

35%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

33

26%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

53

44%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

106

27%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

58

30%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

20

49%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

87

22%

LEVEL 2

169

42%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

59

84%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

35

81%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

74

47%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

46

49%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

141
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

144

31%

LEVEL 2

178

38%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

84

35%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.