SIDNEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

153

35%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

131

39%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

115

38%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

115

30%

LEVEL 2

143

37%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

95

32%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

38

81%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

36

90%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

129
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

149

35%

LEVEL 2

149

35%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

127

44%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

89

45%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.