Skip to Content
Main content

TACONIC HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

197

47%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

124

38%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

116

53%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

158

45%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

100

38%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

88

31%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

36

95%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

120

38%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

95

51%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.