Skip to Content
Main content

TACONIC HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

289

44%

LEVEL 2

226

35%

LEVEL 3

107

16%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

201

41%

LEVEL 2

166

34%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

120

39%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

74

32%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

169

50%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

127

48%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

233

42%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

93

17%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

165

40%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

22

47%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

129

31%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

72

90%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

196

40%

LEVEL 2

165

34%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

146

52%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

128
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

197

40%

LEVEL 2

164

34%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.