Skip to Content
Main content

PLATTSBURGH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

183

44%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

120

40%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

56

39%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

64

41%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

152

44%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

102

40%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

25

57%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

104

32%

LEVEL 2

136

42%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

79

90%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

69

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

179

44%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

71

18%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

56

42%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

141

57%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

91

55%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.