Skip to Content
Main content

PERU CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

275

43%

LEVEL 2

205

32%

LEVEL 3

128

20%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

198

41%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

159

50%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

106

44%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

266

44%

LEVEL 2

192

32%

LEVEL 3

123

20%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

189

41%

LEVEL 2

166

36%

LEVEL 3

79

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

195

38%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

111

90%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

83

89%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

159

60%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

132

58%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.