Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

319

42%

LEVEL 2

285

38%

LEVEL 3

120

16%

LEVEL 4

30

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

219

37%

LEVEL 2

222

38%

LEVEL 3

113

19%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

119

33%

LEVEL 2

154

43%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

200

51%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

132

44%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

307

42%

LEVEL 2

277

38%

LEVEL 3

114

16%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

208

37%

LEVEL 2

214

38%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

183

30%

LEVEL 2

271

45%

LEVEL 3

117

19%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

140

28%

LEVEL 2

209

42%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

136

89%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

79

85%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

138

42%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

235

55%

LEVEL 2

147

34%

LEVEL 3

39

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

136

45%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.