Skip to Content
Main content

OXFORD ACADEMY & CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

134

39%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

76

43%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

69

44%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

114

38%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

100

36%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

12

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

88

30%

LEVEL 2

132

44%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

81

30%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

41

95%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

34

81%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

91

44%

LEVEL 2

85

41%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

84

44%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.