Skip to Content
Main content

NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

386

49%

LEVEL 2

241

31%

LEVEL 3

124

16%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

295

45%

LEVEL 2

207

32%

LEVEL 3

117

18%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

162

41%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

119

37%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

224

57%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

176

54%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

345

48%

LEVEL 2

221

31%

LEVEL 3

118

16%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

263

45%

LEVEL 2

187

32%

LEVEL 3

108

18%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

20

80%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

15

75%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

285

42%

LEVEL 2

230

34%

LEVEL 3

123

18%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

202

37%

LEVEL 2

192

36%

LEVEL 3

116

21%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

101

89%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

93

85%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

117

36%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

269

59%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

44

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

197

56%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

147
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

292

45%

LEVEL 2

205

32%

LEVEL 3

117

18%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.