Skip to Content
Main content

UNADILLA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

187

54%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

155

50%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

77

44%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

56

37%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

110

64%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

99

63%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

176

53%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

145

49%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

136

46%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

51

94%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

50

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

47

41%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

56

47%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

140

60%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

99

52%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

175

53%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

147

49%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.